bernstein v skyviews
Answer:-
In the case of Bernstein v Skyviews, the court ruled that aerial photographers cannot be held liable for trespassing when taking photos over private property, as long as they don't physically interfere with the landowner's enjoyment of their property. The decision clarified the law regarding aerial photography and property rights, recognizing the importance of balancing the rights of landowners with the freedom of individuals to capture images from the air. It set a precedent that has since been referenced in various legal disputes involving aerial photography and property boundaries, establishing a clearer framework for resolving such issues.