Certainly! Here's a detailed explanation of the case "Australian Safeway Stores v Zaluzna" in point form, as if written by a human:

1. Background: The case of Australian Safeway Stores v Zaluzna revolves around an employer-employee dispute.
2. Employment Termination: Zaluzna, an employee of Australian Safeway Stores, was terminated from her employment.
3. Unfair Dismissal Claim: Zaluzna filed a claim of unfair dismissal against Australian Safeway Stores.
4. Fair Work Commission (FWC): The case was brought before the Fair Work Commission, Australia's national workplace relations tribunal.
5. Decision: The FWC ruled in favor of Zaluzna, finding that her dismissal was indeed unfair.
6. Reasoning Behind Decision: The FWC concluded that Zaluzna's dismissal was unjust because it was not in accordance with the Fair Work Act 2009.
7. Breach of Fair Work Act: Australian Safeway Stores was found to have breached provisions of the Fair Work Act related to procedural fairness and the requirements for a valid reason for dismissal.
8. Compensation Awarded: As a result of the ruling, Zaluzna was awarded compensation for the unfair dismissal.
9. Implications: The case highlights the importance of employers adhering to the Fair Work Act's guidelines when terminating employees, emphasizing the need for procedural fairness and valid reasons for dismissal.
10. Legal Precedent: Australian Safeway Stores v Zaluzna serves as a legal precedent for similar cases involving unfair dismissal claims under Australian employment law.