• Que.

    barton v armstrong

    Answer:-

    In the case of Barton v. Armstrong, the court ruled that an agreement between parties, even if not formally executed, could still be legally binding if there's evidence of mutual intent to be bound. The case highlights the importance of understanding the elements of a contract, including offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention to create legal relations. It underscores the principle that agreements don't always need to be in writing to be enforceable, as long as there's clear evidence of both parties' intentions. This decision serves as a reminder to carefully consider the implications of informal agreements and understand their legal ramifications.

    Mar 27 2024

Related Questions

Message me